By Fatima Mukhtar
The ECOWAS Court of Justice has directed the Federal Government of Nigeria to amend or repeal key sections of Kano State’s blasphemy laws, ruling that they violate fundamental human rights, particularly the right to freedom of expression.
The judgment affects Section 210 of the Kano State Penal Code and Section 382(b) of the Kano State Sharia Penal Code Law (2000), both of which prescribe penalties for alleged blasphemy. The court stated that the laws lack clarity and are inconsistent with international human rights conventions that Nigeria has ratified.
According to the court, the provisions are vague, impose excessive punishment, and do not align with democratic standards. It noted that the death penalty for blasphemy under Section 382(b) is incompatible with modern human rights principles.
The ECOWAS Court also ordered the Nigerian government to ensure that similar laws in other northern states are reviewed to align with global human rights norms. It further criticised authorities for failing to curb mob violence associated with blasphemy accusations.
The ruling has generated intense debate across the country. Some northern groups accused ECOWAS of interfering in Islamic legal systems, arguing that the decision threatens religious values and the practice of Sharia in Muslim-majority states. Others welcomed the judgment, saying it protects citizens from oppressive laws and prevents misuse of blasphemy provisions to target individuals unjustly.
The court emphasised that while nations have a responsibility to maintain public order and respect religious beliefs, laws against blasphemy must not undermine human rights or be used to suppress legitimate expression.
The Federal Government is expected to respond to the directive as discussions continue on the future of blasphemy laws in Nigeria.
